Populism and the Farmers’ Revolt
Debt, railroads, money and a new party for ordinary people, about 1867 to 1896
In the decades after the Civil War, American farmers grew more wheat, corn and cotton than ever before. Yet many of them felt they were falling behind. Prices for their crops fell, their debts grew heavier, and they depended on railroads, banks and merchants they could not control. Farmers organized, first in clubs and cooperatives, then in a new political party that promised to give power back to “the plain people.”
In this unit we follow that revolt from the Grange to the People’s Party and the great election of 1896. We also look at the movement’s limits, including the failure of its efforts to unite Black and white farmers. As you read, ask what farmers wanted, who disagreed with them, and why.
Farmers’ Problems
Falling prices. Farmers produced more every year, in the United States and around the world, and crop prices fell for much of the period from the 1870s to the mid-1890s. Wheat that sold for more than a dollar a bushel just after the Civil War often brought far less by the 1890s (prices varied by year and place).
Debt. Many farmers borrowed to buy land, machines and seed. Because prices were falling, the same debt took more and more bushels to repay. Farmers in the West often paid high interest on mortgages.
Crop liens and sharecropping. In the South, many farmers, Black and white, had no land or cash. They rented land as tenants or sharecroppers, and bought supplies on credit from a local merchant, who took a lien on their next crop. Prices on credit were high, and many families ended each year still in debt.
Railroads. In much of the West, a farmer had only one railroad to ship by, and one grain elevator to store in. Farmers complained of high rates, and of railroads that charged more for a short haul than for a long one between cities where lines competed. Railroad owners answered that they faced heavy costs and fierce competition, and that low rates on long routes kept them in business.
Money. Prices across the whole economy fell, a trend called deflation. The United States moved toward a gold standard, and the supply of money grew more slowly than the economy. Farmers believed that more money, from paper currency or silver, would raise prices and ease their debts. Bankers and many business owners argued that only gold kept the dollar sound. Economists today generally agree that a tight money supply helped cause the deflation, though they disagree about how much it hurt farmers compared with other causes such as world competition.
The Grange and the Granger Laws
In 1867, Oliver H. Kelley, a clerk in the federal Department of Agriculture, helped found the Patrons of Husbandry, known as the Grange. It began as a social and educational club for farm families, including women. In the 1870s, Grangers set up cooperative stores and elevators and pressed state legislatures in the Midwest to regulate railroad and elevator rates. These state rules were called the Granger laws.
In Munn v. Illinois (1877), the Supreme Court upheld an Illinois law setting grain elevator rates, saying that businesses “clothed with a public interest” could be regulated. But in the Wabash case (1886), the Court ruled that only Congress could regulate rates on railroads that crossed state lines. Congress responded with the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, which created the first federal regulatory agency. At first the agency had little power, and courts often sided with the railroads.
The Farmers’ Alliances
Starting in Texas around the late 1870s, the Farmers’ Alliance spread across the South and onto the Plains in the 1880s. Its lecturers traveled from town to town, and its members built cooperatives to buy supplies and sell cotton together. Many cooperatives failed for lack of credit, which pushed the Alliance toward politics. Its leader Charles Macune proposed the subtreasury plan: federal warehouses where farmers could store crops and borrow against them at low interest until prices improved. A separate Northern Alliance organized in the Midwest.
The white Southern Alliance did not admit Black members. In 1886, Black farmers in Houston County, Texas, founded the Colored Farmers’ National Alliance and Cooperative Union. It claimed more than a million members by 1891, a figure many historians consider inflated. Most of its members were tenants, sharecroppers and farm laborers. The Colored Alliance and the white Alliances cooperated at times, but their interests could clash. In 1891 the Colored Alliance called a strike of cotton pickers for higher wages, which white landowning Alliance members opposed; the strike failed.
The People’s Party and the Omaha Platform
Alliance candidates did well in the 1890 elections, especially in Kansas and the South. In 1892, Alliance members, Knights of Labor and other reformers founded the People’s Party, whose members were called Populists. At their convention in Omaha on July 4, 1892, they adopted the Omaha Platform. Its main demands were:
- Free silver: the unlimited coining of silver at 16 to 1 with gold, and more paper money.
- A graduated income tax.
- Government ownership of the railroads and the telegraph and telephone lines.
- The subtreasury plan, or a similar system of low-cost federal credit.
- In resolutions attached to the platform, direct election of senators, the secret ballot, a single term for the president, and an eight-hour day for government workers.
The party nominated James B. Weaver of Iowa for president. He won about 1.03 million popular votes, roughly 8.5 percent (rounded figures), and 22 electoral votes by carrying Kansas, Colorado, Idaho and Nevada, plus one elector each in North Dakota and Oregon. It was a strong showing for a new party, though it won few votes in the industrial Northeast or among city workers. One of the party’s best-known speakers was Mary Elizabeth Lease of Kansas. She is often quoted as telling farmers to “raise less corn and more hell,” but the line was probably made up by a newspaper; she later said she had not said it, though she called it good advice.
The Panic of 1893 and Coxey’s Army
In 1893 a wave of railroad and bank failures set off the worst depression the country had yet seen. Unemployment may have reached around 15 to 20 percent of industrial workers (an estimate; no official count existed). President Grover Cleveland, a Democrat, believed the government’s silver purchases had shaken confidence in the dollar, and he persuaded Congress to repeal the Sherman Silver Purchase Act. That split his party.
In the spring of 1894, Ohio businessman Jacob Coxey led a march of unemployed men to Washington, D.C., to ask Congress to create jobs building roads, paid for with new paper money. Newspapers called it Coxey’s Army. Several hundred men arrived (estimates vary), and on May 1 Coxey was arrested for walking on the Capitol grounds. The march achieved nothing at the time, but the idea of government jobs in hard times returned in later decades.
The Election of 1896
By 1896, “free silver” had become the leading issue in the South and West. At the Democratic convention in Chicago, William Jennings Bryan, a 36-year-old former congressman from Nebraska, gave the speech that ended with the words “you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold” (July 9, 1896). It won him the nomination.
The Democrats had taken the Populists’ best-known issue. The People’s Party faced a hard choice: run its own candidate and split the silver vote, or fuse with the Democrats. It chose fusion and nominated Bryan, but named Tom Watson of Georgia as its vice presidential candidate instead of the Democrats’ choice. Some Populists, especially in the South, opposed fusion, warning that the party would lose its identity and its wider program.
Bryan traveled thousands of miles and gave hundreds of speeches. The Republican, William McKinley of Ohio, campaigned from his front porch, backed by a large campaign fund raised by Mark Hanna from business leaders. McKinley promised a sound dollar and a protective tariff that would bring back factory jobs. He won with about 7.1 million popular votes to Bryan’s 6.5 million (rounded), and 271 electoral votes to 176. Bryan swept the South and much of the West, but McKinley carried the Northeast and the industrial Midwest, including many city workers. After 1896, the People’s Party faded quickly.
Race and the Limits of Populism
In the South, Populists faced the question of race directly. Tom Watson, a Georgia congressman, argued in the early 1890s that Black and white farmers shared the same economic interests and were being kept apart by racial appeals. Some Southern Populists sought Black votes and defended Black voters against intimidation. These efforts were limited: few Populists supported social equality, and the alliance was often more a matter of votes than of shared power.
Democrats in the South fought back with fraud, violence and appeals to white unity. After the Populist challenge, Southern states moved to take away the vote from Black citizens and many poor white citizens through poll taxes, literacy tests and white-only primaries. Mississippi began in 1890, and in Williams v. Mississippi (1898) the Supreme Court let its rules stand. Other states followed. Watson himself later turned to bitter attacks on Black Americans, Catholics and Jews, and he was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1920.
Legacy
The People’s Party never won the presidency, but many of its ideas later became law, often promoted by Progressives in both major parties. The 16th Amendment (1913) allowed a federal income tax, and the 17th Amendment (1913) provided for the direct election of senators. Many states adopted the secret ballot, the initiative and the referendum. The Federal Reserve (1913) and later farm credit programs gave the government a larger role in money and credit. Government ownership of the railroads and free silver did not come to pass.
A famous later idea is that L. Frank Baum’s The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1900) was a hidden allegory about Populism, with a yellow brick road for gold and silver shoes for silver. This was suggested in 1964 by Henry Littlefield, a high school teacher, in an essay in the journal American Quarterly. Baum never said the book had such a meaning, and many historians doubt it. Treat it as a later interpretation, not a fact.
How Historians See It
A backward-looking movement?
In The Age of Reform (1955), Richard Hofstadter argued that the Populists looked back to a lost world of small farms. He pointed to conspiracy talk, hostility to immigrants and, in some writing, anti-Jewish language. Critics say he relied on a small set of sources and judged the movement by its worst speakers.
A democratic movement?
In Democratic Promise (1976), Lawrence Goodwyn saw Populism as a grassroots movement built through cooperatives, where ordinary people learned to challenge concentrated wealth. Critics say he played down its racial limits and treated fusion as a betrayal. Later historians, such as Charles Postel in The Populist Vision (2007), argue that Populists were modernizers who wanted a stronger, more active government.
Timeline, 1867 to 1913
Click or tap (or Tab to) an event and press Enter to open it. Use the buttons to show only one kind of event.
Dot colors: farm economy organizing politics and elections law and government
1867 The Grange organizing
Oliver H. Kelley and others found the Patrons of Husbandry, known as the Grange, a social and educational club for farm families that soon turns to cooperatives and politics.
1873 The “Crime of ’73” law and government
The Coinage Act of 1873 ends the coining of silver dollars. Silver supporters later call it the “Crime of ’73.”
1873 Panic of 1873 farm economy
A financial panic begins a long depression. Crop prices keep falling for much of the next two decades.
1877 Munn v. Illinois law and government
The Supreme Court rules that states may regulate businesses “clothed with a public interest,” such as grain elevators.
1877 Farmers’ Alliance begins organizing
Farmers in Lampasas County, Texas, form an alliance (the exact year is uncertain). It grows into the Southern Farmers’ Alliance.
1886 Colored Farmers’ Alliance organizing
Black farmers organize the Colored Farmers’ National Alliance and Cooperative Union in Houston County, Texas (December 11).
1886 Wabash case law and government
The Supreme Court rules that only Congress, not the states, can regulate railroad rates that cross state lines.
1887 Interstate Commerce Act law and government
Congress creates the Interstate Commerce Commission to oversee railroad rates, the first federal regulatory agency. At first it has little power.
1887 Dry years on the Plains farm economy
Several years of drought begin on the western Great Plains. Many settlers in Kansas and Nebraska lose their farms.
1890 Sherman Silver Purchase Act law and government
Congress orders the Treasury to buy silver each month, a compromise that pleases neither side.
1890 Ocala Demands organizing
The Southern Alliance, meeting in Ocala, Florida, calls for the subtreasury plan, more money in circulation and direct election of senators.
1890 Alliance victories politics and elections
Alliance-backed candidates win many races in the South and West, including several seats in Congress.
1890 Mississippi constitution law and government
Mississippi adopts a poll tax and literacy test meant to keep Black citizens from voting. Other Southern states follow.
1892 Omaha Platform politics and elections
The People’s Party adopts its platform in Omaha on July 4 and nominates James B. Weaver for president.
1893 Panic of 1893 farm economy
Railroads and banks fail, and the worst depression the country had yet seen begins.
1893 Silver purchases end law and government
At President Cleveland’s urging, Congress repeals the Sherman Silver Purchase Act.
1894 Coxey’s Army politics and elections
Jacob Coxey leads several hundred unemployed men from Ohio to Washington to ask for public works jobs. He is arrested for walking on the Capitol grounds (May 1).
1896 Cross of Gold politics and elections
William Jennings Bryan’s speech at the Democratic convention in Chicago (July 9) wins him the nomination.
1896 McKinley elected politics and elections
Republican William McKinley defeats Bryan, who was also the People’s Party nominee (November 3).
1898 Williams v. Mississippi law and government
The Supreme Court allows Mississippi’s literacy test and poll tax to stand.
1900 Gold Standard Act law and government
Congress makes gold the only standard for U.S. money.
1913 Two amendments law and government
The 16th Amendment allows a federal income tax, and the 17th provides for the direct election of senators.
Activity: Gold or Silver?
Either answer can be defended with evidence. It is the fall of 1896, and you must decide how to vote on the money question. For each piece of evidence, decide whether it points toward free silver, points toward gold, or could support either side. The last group shows what happened after the election; decide whether it changes your view. You can change your mind at any time.
The Case for Silver
Farmers, silver miners and William Jennings Bryan
Prices for wheat, corn and cotton fell for much of the period after the Civil War, so each year’s debts took more of the crop to pay off.
The supply of money grew more slowly than the population and the economy, which many economists today agree helped push prices down.
Silver miners in the West wanted the government to buy and coin their metal.
Bryan argued that the United States should not wait for Britain and other nations to agree before using silver.
Coining silver at 16 to 1 would have valued it above its market price, so a silver dollar would have held less metal value than a gold dollar.
Weigh each piece of evidence to see where you lean.
The Case for Gold
Bankers, many business owners and William McKinley
Gold supporters said a “sound dollar” protected savings, wages and pensions from being eaten away by inflation.
Lenders feared being repaid in cheaper dollars, and some warned that loans would become harder to get.
Britain, the center of world finance, used gold, and British investors held many American railroad bonds.
McKinley said that factories, not new money, would bring back jobs, and he promised a protective tariff.
Some city workers worried that inflation would raise food prices faster than their wages.
Weigh each piece of evidence to see where you lean.
What Happened Next
1897 to 1913
New gold finds in South Africa, the Klondike and Alaska, and better ways to process ore, greatly increased the world’s gold supply.
Crop prices began to rise after 1897, and many farmers had better years.
The Gold Standard Act of 1900 made gold the only standard for U.S. money.
The money supply grew after all, without free silver. Some say this proved the silver side right about money but wrong about silver.
Congress created the Federal Reserve in 1913 to make the money supply more flexible.
Weigh each piece of evidence to see where you lean.
Your turn: would you have voted for Bryan or McKinley in 1896? Write two sentences, using at least one piece of evidence that points each way, and explain which weighs more for you.
Primary Sources
3 short excerpts, checked word for word against the online copies listed below.
“The conditions which surround us best justify our co-operation; we meet in the midst of a nation brought to the verge of moral, political, and material ruin. Corruption dominates the ballot-box, the Legislatures, the Congress, and touches even the ermine of the bench.”
The preamble was written by Ignatius Donnelly of Minnesota. “The ermine of the bench” means judges, who wore ermine-trimmed robes. Supporters read the preamble as a fair picture of hard times; critics called it alarmist.
“The fruits of the toil of millions are boldly stolen to build up colossal fortunes for a few, unprecedented in the history of mankind; and the possessors of these, in turn despise the Republic and endanger liberty. From the same prolific womb of governmental injustice we breed the two great classes—tramps and millionaires.”
The same preamble also blamed “imported pauperized labor” for low wages and warned of “a vast conspiracy against mankind” on “two continents.” Historians still argue over how to read language like this (see “How Historians See It” above). Printed copies of the platform differ slightly in wording; this excerpt follows the American Presidency Project text.
“Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests, and the toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”
These are the last words of the speech. Bryan was 36 years old and a former congressman from Nebraska. The image of a crown of thorns and a cross comes from the death of Jesus in the Bible. Gold supporters thought it was reckless to compare a money policy to a crucifixion.
Key Terms
- Populism
- A political movement that claims to speak for ordinary people against powerful elites. In the 1890s it meant the People’s Party and its supporters.
- Grange
- The Patrons of Husbandry, a farmers’ organization founded in 1867 that set up cooperatives and pushed for railroad regulation.
- Cooperative
- A business owned by its members, such as farmers who buy supplies or sell crops together to get better prices.
- Crop lien
- A loan from a merchant, paid back out of the next harvest. The merchant held a claim on the crop and often charged high prices and interest.
- Sharecropping
- Farming someone else’s land in return for a share of the crop, common in the South after the Civil War.
- Deflation
- A general fall in prices. It makes debts harder to repay, because each dollar owed is worth more.
- Gold standard
- A system in which a country’s money can be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold.
- Free silver
- The demand that the government coin all silver brought to it, at a ratio of 16 ounces of silver to 1 of gold, to put more money into circulation.
- Subtreasury plan
- A Farmers’ Alliance plan for federal warehouses where farmers could store crops and borrow money against them at low interest.
- Graduated income tax
- A tax that takes a larger share of higher incomes.
- Fusion
- When two parties back the same candidates, as the Populists and Democrats did in 1896.
- Disfranchisement
- Taking away the right to vote, for example through poll taxes and literacy tests.
Discussion Questions
- Farmers blamed railroads, banks and the gold standard for their troubles. Which of these do you think mattered most, and what other causes might they have missed?
- The Populists lost almost every national election but saw many of their ideas become law. Was the movement a failure or a success?
- Was fusion with the Democrats in 1896 a smart move or a mistake for the People’s Party? Explain what each choice would have cost.
- Tom Watson called on Black and white farmers to work together, then later turned to racist attacks. What does his story suggest about the limits of the interracial alliance?
- Some historians see the Populists as backward-looking and others as democratic reformers. Using evidence from this unit, which view do you find more convincing?
Test Yourself
10 questions on farmers and the Populists. Click an answer to check it.
Farmers and Populists
Sources and Further Reading
Primary sources quoted
- People’s Party, Omaha Platform, July 4, 1892. The American Presidency Project, UC Santa Barbara, Populist Party Platform of 1892; the first excerpt was also checked against Wikisource, Omaha Platform, whose copy of the second differs slightly (“those, in turn, despise the republic”).
- William Jennings Bryan, speech of July 9, 1896. Digital History, University of Houston, “Cross of Gold” speech; also checked against Wikisource, Cross of Gold Speech.
Further reading
- The American Presidency Project, UC Santa Barbara, “Populist Party Platform of 1892”: www.presidency.ucsb.edu
- Digital History, University of Houston, Bryan’s “Cross of Gold” speech: www.digitalhistory.uh.edu
- Library of Congress, National Recording Registry essay on William Jennings Bryan (PDF): www.loc.gov
- Library of Congress, Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1877): www.loc.gov
- Library of Congress, Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois, 118 U.S. 557 (1886): www.loc.gov
- National Archives, “Interstate Commerce Act (1887)”: www.archives.gov
- National Archives, “16th Amendment: Federal Income Tax (1913)”: www.archives.gov
- National Archives, “17th Amendment: Direct Election of U.S. Senators (1913)”: www.archives.gov
- U.S. Senate, “Direct Election of Senators”: www.senate.gov
- Texas State Historical Association, Handbook of Texas, “Colored Farmers’ Alliance”: www.tshaonline.org
- Texas State Historical Association, Handbook of Texas, “Farmers’ Alliance”: www.tshaonline.org
- Texas State Historical Association, Handbook of Texas, “Lease, Mary Elizabeth Clyens”: www.tshaonline.org
- New Georgia Encyclopedia, “Thomas E. Watson”: www.georgiaencyclopedia.org
- New Georgia Encyclopedia, “Populist Party”: www.georgiaencyclopedia.org
- Library of Congress, “Rise of Industrial America, 1876–1900”: www.loc.gov
Interpretation
- Richard Hofstadter, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. (1955).
- Lawrence Goodwyn, Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America (1976).
- Charles Postel, The Populist Vision (2007).
- Henry M. Littlefield, “The Wizard of Oz: Parable on Populism,” American Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1964).