American Short Stories

High School English · American Short Stories · Unit 1

O. Henry and the Twist Ending

A watch chain with no watch, a leaf that never falls, and a kidnapping that costs the kidnappers.

Around 1905, millions of Americans read their fiction in newspapers and magazines, and one writer seemed to be in all of them. He signed his stories “O. Henry.” Readers knew him for one move above all: the last paragraph that flips the whole story over.

This unit looks at how that move works. You will read four of his best-known stories and learn to spot the tools behind the surprise: foreshadowing, situational irony and dramatic irony. A good twist is not a trick pulled from nowhere. The clues are on the page the whole time.

On this page: his life and pen name, a craft toolkit, a guide to each story (summary, clues and questions), a note on period attitudes, a clue-spotting game, a quiz, and questions that connect the stories.

Before you read. These stories first appeared between 1904 and 1907. “The Last Leaf” deals with serious illness and a death from pneumonia. “The Ransom of Red Chief” is a comedy about a kidnapping, and the boy’s games use stereotypes about Native Americans that were common then and are hurtful now. One sentence in that story also uses a racial slur. We do not reprint either; our note on period attitudes explains.

His Life: From Austin to a Prison Pharmacy to New York

O. Henry was the pen name of William Sydney Porter. He was born William Sidney Porter in Greensboro, North Carolina, on September 11, 1862, and changed the spelling of his middle name to Sydney in 1898. His life had nearly as many reversals as his stories.

  1. 1862–1882 · North Carolina. Porter works in his uncle’s pharmacy and becomes a licensed pharmacist at 19. In March 1882 he moves to Texas, where he first lives on a ranch.
  2. 1884–1891 · Austin. He settles in Austin in 1884, marries Athol Estes in 1887, and works as a draftsman at the Texas General Land Office from 1887 until January 1891.
  3. 1891–1895 · The bank. He becomes a teller and bookkeeper at the First National Bank of Austin. The bank is run informally, and his books are careless. In 1894 the bank accuses him of embezzlement and he loses the job. He runs a humorous weekly, The Rolling Stone, until it fails in April 1895, then writes for the Houston Post.
  4. 1896–1897 · Flight. Federal auditors find the shortages, and he is indicted. The day before his trial, set for July 7, 1896, he flees to New Orleans and then to Honduras, which had no extradition treaty with the United States. When he learns Athol is dying of tuberculosis, he returns to Austin in February 1897 and surrenders. She dies on July 25, 1897.
  5. 1898–1901 · Prison in Ohio. On February 17, 1898, he is found guilty of embezzling $854.08 and sentenced to five years. He enters the Ohio Penitentiary in Columbus on March 25, 1898, and works in the prison hospital as the night druggist. While inside he publishes 14 stories under pen names. He is released early for good behavior on July 24, 1901, after about three years.
  6. 1902–1910 · New York City. After time in Pittsburgh with his daughter Margaret, he moves to New York in 1902 to be near his publishers. There he writes 381 short stories, including a story a week for more than a year for the New York World Sunday Magazine. He marries Sarah (Sallie) Coleman in 1907; she leaves him two years later. He dies in New York on June 5, 1910.

New York gave him most of his material. A character in one of his stories calls the city “Bagdad-on-the-Subway,” after the Baghdad of The Arabian Nights, a place where any stranger might have a tale. His first big New York collection, The Four Million (April 10, 1906), is full of shop girls, clerks, cops, con men and struggling artists. Today the O. Henry Prize for short fiction is named for him.

Where “O. Henry” Came From

The name “O. Henry” first appeared over the story “Whistling Dick’s Christmas Stocking” in the December 1899 issue of McClure’s Magazine, while Porter was still in prison. A friend in New Orleans forwarded his stories, so editors did not know where the writer was. By about 1902 it was the only name he used.

Where the name came from is not settled. Porter himself gave more than one explanation. Here are the main ones; notice that none can be proved.

Ask yourself: why might a man just out of prison want a name, and a story about the name, that pointed anywhere but Ohio?

The Twist Toolkit

Four terms you will use in every story on this page.

Foreshadowing

A hint, early in a story, of what will happen later. Good foreshadowing is easy to miss the first time and obvious the second. Rereading the story after the ending is the best way to find it.

Situational irony

When the outcome is the opposite of what the characters, or readers, expected. Kidnappers who pay the father to take his son back are a clear case.

Dramatic irony

When the reader knows something a character does not. We know Della has sold her hair before Jim walks in the door; he does not. The tension comes from waiting for him to find out.

Many readers call the ending of “The Gift of the Magi” dramatic irony too, because we learn about the hair before Jim does.

The O. Henry ending

A surprise or twist ending: a last-minute reversal that changes how you read everything before it. It became so linked to Porter that it took his name. The critic Louis Menand put his method this way: “He took probable situations and gave them improbable outcomes.”

A fair twist. A surprise ending feels earned when it was set up by clues you could have noticed. It feels cheap when the writer hid everything. As you read, keep a list of details that seem odd or extra. Many of them will matter at the end.

The Gift of the Magi

Story · New York Sunday World, December 10, 1905 · collected in The Four Million (1906) · Read it free at Project Gutenberg

Original illustration: on a wooden table in front of a narrow wall mirror sit two open gift boxes. One holds a set of tortoise-shell combs with jeweled rims; the other holds a coiled platinum watch chain. A few coins lie between them.

Two gifts, and no way to use either one. Original art made for Jugami.

Publication. The story first ran in the New York Sunday World on December 10, 1905, under the title “Gifts of the Magi.” It appeared in book form in The Four Million in April 1906.

Summary. The story opens with a count: “One dollar and eighty-seven cents. That was all. And sixty cents of it was in pennies.” It is the day before Christmas, and that is all Della Young has to buy a present for her husband, Jim. They live in a furnished flat at $8 a week. They own two treasures: Jim’s gold watch, which was his father’s and grandfather’s, and Della’s long brown hair.

Della goes to Madame Sofronie, a dealer in hair goods, and sells her hair for twenty dollars. She spends twenty-one on a plain platinum fob chain worthy of Jim’s watch, which he has been carrying on an old leather strap. At home she curls what is left of her hair and waits. Jim comes in, stops, and stares at her with an expression “that she could not read.” Then he hands her his present: a set of combs she has admired in a Broadway window, “pure tortoise shell, with jewelled rims,” made for the hair she no longer has. When she shows him the chain, he answers: “I sold the watch to get the money to buy your combs. And now suppose you put the chops on.”

The narrator ends by calling the two “foolish children” who sacrificed their greatest treasures for each other, and then says that of all who give gifts, “they are wisest… They are the magi.”

Clues and craft

  • Foreshadowing: early on, the narrator lists the couple’s two treasures side by side. Once you know both, you can guess what each might give up.
  • A planted promise: “The magi brought valuable gifts, but that was not among them. This dark assertion will be illuminated later on.” The narrator tells you outright that the ending will explain itself.
  • Dramatic irony: we know about the hair before Jim does, so his strange stare makes us nervous for Della.
  • Situational irony: each gift is perfect and useless. The combs need the hair; the chain needs the watch.

Discussion questions

  1. The narrator calls Della and Jim both “foolish” and “wisest.” How can both be true?
  2. Jim’s calm reaction to the chain surprises many readers. What does “suppose you put the chops on” show about him?
  3. The magi were the wise men who brought gifts to the infant Jesus. Why compare this poor couple to them?
  4. Is the ending sad, happy, or something else? Point to the words that decide it for you.

The Ransom of Red Chief

Story · The Saturday Evening Post, July 6, 1907 · collected in Whirligigs (1910) · Read it free at Project Gutenberg

Summary. The narrator, Sam, admits right away that the plan failed: “It looked like a good thing: but wait till I tell you.” He and his partner, Bill Driscoll, need two thousand dollars for “a fraudulent town-lot scheme in Western Illinois.” In the sleepy town of Summit, Alabama, they kidnap the ten-year-old son of Ebenezer Dorset, a tight-fisted, respectable citizen, and hide him in a cave on a mountain nearby.

The boy, Johnny, loves it. He names himself “Red Chief,” turns the kidnapping into a game, and makes Bill’s life miserable. He catches Bill “neatly in the eye with a piece of brick,” puts a hot boiled potato down his back, and rides him like a horse. “That boy had Bill terrorized from the start.” Meanwhile Summit stays calm; nobody seems to be searching. The men lower their demand from two thousand to fifteen hundred dollars and sign the letter “TWO DESPERATE MEN.”

Dorset’s answer turns the deal upside down: “You bring Johnny home and pay me two hundred and fifty dollars in cash, and I agree to take him off your hands.” The kidnappers accept. At midnight they hand over the money, and the boy clings to Bill’s leg. Dorset says, “I’m not as strong as I used to be… but I think I can promise you ten minutes.” Bill runs for it.

Clues and craft

  • Foreshadowing: “but wait till I tell you” appears twice in the first paragraphs. The narrator has already lived the ending.
  • Early warning: the first time Bill speaks to the boy, he gets a brick in the eye. The victim is not going to act like a victim.
  • Situational irony: the kidnappers end up paying the ransom. The “desperate men” are desperate to give the boy back.
  • Comic voice: Sam uses big words in the wrong places, like “a moment of temporary mental apparition.” The joke is partly on his idea of himself as clever.

Discussion questions

  1. Who is the real captive in this story? Find two moments that support your answer.
  2. Dorset seems to understand his son better than the kidnappers do. What does his letter show about him?
  3. Sam tells the story after it is over. How does that change the way you read it?
  4. The story makes a kidnapping funny. What choices does O. Henry make so that readers never fear for the child?

After Twenty Years

Story · New York Sunday World, February 14, 1904 · collected in The Four Million (1906) · Read it free at Project Gutenberg

Summary. At about ten o’clock on a cold, windy night, a policeman on his beat finds a man waiting in the doorway of a dark hardware store. The man explains: twenty years ago tonight he ate dinner at “Big Joe” Brady’s restaurant, which once stood on this spot, with his best friend, Jimmy Wells. The next morning he left for the West. The two friends agreed to meet here again in exactly twenty years. The policeman knows the place: “Until five years ago… It was torn down then.”

When the man strikes a match to light his cigar, the light shows “a pale, square-jawed face with keen eyes, and a little white scar near his right eyebrow,” and a large diamond scarfpin. He brags that out West he has had “to compete with some of the sharpest wits going to get my pile.” The policeman wishes him luck and walks on.

About twenty minutes later a tall man in a long overcoat arrives and greets him as Bob. They walk off arm in arm. Under the bright lights of a drug store, Bob stops: “Twenty years is a long time, but not long enough to change a man’s nose from a Roman to a pug.” The tall man is a plainclothes officer. “Silky” Bob is wanted in Chicago, and he has been under arrest for ten minutes. The officer hands him a note from Patrolman Wells. Jimmy was the policeman in the doorway. He recognized the wanted man’s face in the match light, and “Somehow I couldn’t do it myself, so I went around and got a plain clothes man to do the job.”

Clues and craft

  • Foreshadowing: the policeman knows exactly when Brady’s was torn down. He knows this corner very well.
  • The match: O. Henry describes the face in detail at the one moment the policeman can see it clearly.
  • A clue spoken aloud: Bob says, “I never thought you were so tall by two or three inches.” He notices, then talks himself out of it.
  • Situational irony: Bob keeps the appointment to prove loyalty, and the loyal friend is the one who has him arrested.

Discussion questions

  1. Did Jimmy do the right thing? Did he betray his friend, or keep faith with him in the only way he could?
  2. Why couldn’t Jimmy arrest Bob himself? What does the note show about him?
  3. Bob says the West puts “a razor-edge” on a man. How does the ending answer his boast?
  4. Reread the first two paragraphs. Which details about the policeman look different now?

The Last Leaf

Story · New York Sunday World, October 15, 1905 · collected in The Trimmed Lamp (1907) · Read it free at Project Gutenberg

Summary. Two young artists, Sue and Johnsy, share a studio at the top of a three-story brick house in Greenwich Village. One is from Maine and one from California. In November, pneumonia sweeps through the neighborhood, and Johnsy falls very ill. The doctor gives her “one chance in—let us say, ten,” and says her chances will be better if she can find something to live for.

Instead, Johnsy lies counting the leaves that fall from an old ivy vine on the brick wall outside her window. “When the last one falls I must go, too.” Sue tells their neighbor downstairs, old Behrman, a failed painter who “had been always about to paint a masterpiece, but had never yet begun it.” A blank canvas in his room “had been waiting there for twenty-five years.” He scoffs at Johnsy’s idea. Then Sue and Behrman “peered out the window fearfully at the ivy vine. Then they looked at each other for a moment without speaking.” Outside, “A persistent, cold rain was falling, mingled with snow.”

In the morning one leaf is still there. It survives a second stormy night too, and Johnsy decides that it is a sin to want to die. She begins to recover. Then Sue tells her that Behrman has died of pneumonia after two days. The janitor found his shoes and clothes wet through and icy cold. Then they found a lantern, still lit, a ladder that had been moved, and a palette of green and yellow paint. “Didn’t you wonder why it never fluttered or moved when the wind blew? Ah, darling, it’s Behrman’s masterpiece—he painted it there the night that the last leaf fell.”

Clues and craft

  • Foreshadowing: Behrman’s unpainted masterpiece is introduced early and seems like a sad detail about his life. The last word of the story is “fell,” but the key word is “masterpiece.”
  • The silent look: Sue and Behrman look at the vine and then at each other “without speaking.” Something is decided, and we are not told what.
  • The weather: the cold rain and snow explain both the miracle and the cost. No real leaf would last; any man outside that night would be at risk.
  • Situational irony: the old man who never painted a masterpiece paints one, and it costs his life to save another.

Discussion questions

  1. Did you guess what Behrman did before the last paragraph? Which clue gave it away, or should have?
  2. Why does O. Henry let Sue explain the ending instead of showing Behrman on the ladder?
  3. Is a painted leaf a real masterpiece? Argue yes or no.
  4. Johnsy gets better because she believes something that is not true. Is that a hopeful ending?

Period Attitudes

These stories were written for readers in the early 1900s. Reading them well means noticing the attitudes of their time.

Spot the Clue

Find the Foreshadowing

Eight rounds, two from each story. Each round gives three details from the story. Choose the one that hints at the twist ending. A right pick is marked ✓ Right; a wrong pick is marked ✗ Try again, and you can choose again. Your score counts first tries.

Quiz

The Twist Ending Quiz

Choose one answer per question. Your pick is marked ✓ if it is right or ✗ if it is not, the right answer is marked ✓, and a short explanation follows. Your score appears at the end.

Connecting the Stories

For class or for your own journal. Use evidence from at least two stories.

  1. In three of these stories, someone gives up something for another person. Rank the sacrifices from smallest to largest and defend your order.
  2. Which twist was the hardest to see coming? Which was the most fairly set up? Are those the same story?
  3. Pick one story and rewrite the last paragraph so there is no twist. What is lost?
  4. Critics have called O. Henry’s endings gimmicks. After reading four, do you agree? Is a twist worth more when it also carries feeling?
  5. Two stories turn on a friend or neighbor who acts in secret. Why might O. Henry keep the act offstage until the end?
  6. Write a story of about 300 words with a twist ending. Plant at least two clues, then trade with a partner and see if they can find them.

Sources and Credits